Thursday, January 19, 2012

Differences in Leadership: Buffett v. Obama


Leadership is a process in which a person influences and motivates others to achieve a set goal in a cohesive and orderly way. I have learned from my Strategic Management class that there are a few characteristics of good strategic leaders that lead to high performance in an organization.  These include:
      
1. Vision, Eloquence, and Consistency
This implies that it is important to have a sense of direction, be able to properly express the sense of direction and be consistent in reinforcing the sense of direction
2. Articulation of the Business Model
This means that the individual must be able to understand and explain how the organization will attain the vision.
3. Commitment
This means that the leader is dedicated and passionate. One way to show commitment would be leading by example.
4. Being Well-Informed
Becoming well-informed is best achieved through a network in formal and informal sources.
5. Willingness to Delegate and Empower
This is imperative so that one person doesn’t become overloaded with responsibilities.
6. Astute Use of Power
The leader attempts to build consensus for their ideas rather than force ideas through.
7. Emotional Intelligence
This is a term created by Daniel Goldman that suggests a good balance of self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills allows a leader to move people in a desired direction.

I think that each of these characteristics is important for a leader to posses. I have decided that the best way to highlight the differences between Warren Buffett’s and Barack Obama’s leadership style and “brand” is to comment on each leader (based on the assigned readings) following the leadership characteristics listed above.
1. Vision, Eloquence, and Consistency
*Buffett: Buffett seems to have a blurry vision. If his vision is to keep the financial results high and increasing, then he shouldn’t be so pessimistic. However, he is consistent with his message that the stock market is a gamble and there is a possibility that the positive results of his company may not be repeated. Buffett is good at communicating.
*Obama: Obama has a strong vision, he is good at communicating it and it remains consistent.
2. Articulation of the Business Model
*Buffett: Buffett’s business strategy is well-known. He is known for keeping “his head while others are losing theirs...” He buys out companies at an advantageous price when the stock market is turbulent.
*Obama: Obama may have a very strong vision, however, it is blurry how he plans to accomplish these goals.
3. Commitment
*Buffett: Buffett’s commitment is apparent because he leads by example. He is pessimistic about the stock market, he is frugal and a penny-pincher. He believes that these are the ways to be a smart and successful investor.
*Obama: Obama’s commitment is evident through his speeches. He is able to inspire people by demonstrating that he cares about the people. His emotion toward the topics at hand are evident in his speeches.
4. Being Well-Informed 
* I think the success of both leaders have demonstrated that they are well-informed.
5. Willingness to Delegate and Empower
*Buffett: Buffett made a comment saying “(Berkshire) didn’t miss me while I was gone.” I think that this implies that Buffet has done a very good job of delegating power and empowering his employees
*Obama: Obama did a great job of delegating when he hired Chris Hughes to do the social networking for the campaign.
6. Astute Use of Power
*Buffett: Based on his financial success, Buffett is able to use his power to form a consensus when it comes to making decisions.
*Obama: I think that Obama uses the power of being the first African-American man to climb the political latter so high in his favor. This helps him to inspire and motivate people.
7. Emotional Intelligence
* Buffett: I think that Buffett has a moderate level of emotional intelligence. I think that his self-awareness is very good, he is able to keep calm and collected in the face of calamity. Also, he thinks before acting. He has good social and communication skills. However, he is not a good motivator due to his pessimism. This is unfortunate because I believe that motivation is very important in a leader.
*Obama: Obama has very high emotional intelligence. This is apparent because he easily gains trust and confidence from the people, his motivation is infectious, and he is able to move people in the direction of his vision.

Overall I think that image is very important to a leader and it needs to be strategically aligned with their goals. For example, if Obama had a laid back, lack of motivation,  penny-pinching persona (like that of Buffett) it is likely that he wouldn’t have attained presidency because his image would go against his beliefs. There are many different leadership styles that have proven to be successful. The key to leadership success is that the image they portray is aligned with their goals.

Sources (other than those provided):
Hill, C.L. & Jones, G.R. (2012). Strategic Management, An Integrated Approach.
            Mason : South-Western, Cengage Learning.

1 comment:

  1. I agree with your analyze of the differences and similarities with Buffett and Obama. They are both great leaders in different ways. If either had adopted the other stance they would have failed because it wasn't aligned with their views and beliefs. Image is one of those things that will always matter! Take a first impression for example, that is an image that gets drilled into your head right away and is probably the deciding factor in the image you portray.

    ReplyDelete